Craig Eisele on …..

March 27, 2012

BAD WEEK for Huawei Technologies of China

Filed under: Uncategorized — Mr. Craig @ 11:50 pm

FIRST:

Australia Bars Huawei From Broadband Project

By MAGGIE LU YUEYANG | REUTERS

CANBERRA — Australia has blocked Huawei Technologies of China from bidding on contracts in the $38 billion Australian National Broadband Network, citing security concerns, Huawei said Monday.

“We were informed by the government that there is no role for Huawei” in the network, said Jeremy Mitchell, a spokesman in Australia for Huawei, one of the world’s largest suppliers of telecommunications equipment.

The Australian plan is the largest infrastructure project in the country’s history. It is intended to connect 93 percent of homes and workplaces with fiber-optic cable, providing broadband service in urban and rural areas.

It was announced in 2009 by the Australian government with a committed investment of as much as $38 billion. The network is expected to be ready by 2020.

The Australian Financial Review newspaper said in a report Monday that Huawei had sought to secure a supply contract worth as much as 1 billion Australian dollars, or $1.05 billion, as part of the project, but had been blocked by the Australian attorney general on the basis of advice from the Australian Security Intelligence Organization.

The office of the attorney general said in a news release, “This is consistent with the government’s practice for ensuring the security and resilience of Australia’s critical infrastructure more broadly.”

The network is “a strategic and significant government investment,” the attorney general’s office told Bloomberg News. “We have a responsibility to do our utmost to protect its integrity and that of the information carried on it.”

The government declined to comment on its specific discussions with companies, which are confidential, the office said.

The security agency declined to comment on the report.

On the sidelines of a nuclear security summit meeting in South Korea, Prime Minister Julia Gillard of Australia said the government had made the correct decision.

“You would expect as a government that we make all of the prudent decisions to make sure that the infrastructure project does what we want it to do, and we’ve taken one of those decisions,” she said.

Huawei was founded by its chief executive, Ren Zhengfei, a former officer of the People’s Liberation Army in China. That has led to claims that it has too cozy a relationship with the Chinese government.

The company. based in Shenzhen, China, has been struggling to expand its business in the United States, which has blocked its equipment deals, citing national security concerns and allegations that Huawei had violated sanctions by supplying Iran with banned equipment.

“While we’re obviously disappointed by the decision,” the company said, referring to the Australian rejection, “Huawei will continue to be open and transparent and work to find ways of providing assurance around the security of our technology.”

Mr. Mitchell told the Australian Broadcasting Corp.: “We have never been told by the Chinese government to do a certain thing. If we would, that would be to our detriment, and we would lose the market share that we have.”

A former Australian foreign minister, Alexander Downer, who is an independent director on the board of Huawei’s Australian unit, rejected the government’s security concerns.

“This sort of whole concept of Huawei being involved in cyberwarfare, presumably that would just be based on the fact that the company comes from China,” he said on ABC Radio on Monday. “This is just completely absurd.”

Mr. Mitchell told Bloomberg that “the bar is set higher” for the company because of where it is from.

He said Huawei was working on eight broadband networks similar to the Australian plan in Benin, Britain, Brunei, Cameroon, Malaysia, New Zealand, Singapore and the United Arab Emirates.

THEN:

Symantec Dissolves a Chinese Alliance

By NICOLE PERLROTH and JOHN MARKOFF

SAN FRANCISCO — Less than four years after Huawei Technologies and Symantec teamed up to develop computer network security products, the joint venture is being dismantled because Symantec feared the alliance with the Chinese company would prevent it from obtaining United States government classified information about cyberthreats.

According to two people briefed on the deal, Symantec’s decision was a pre-emptive political maneuver timed to coincide with the United States government’s efforts to share more classified cyberthreat information with the private sector. People with knowledge of the venture, who would speak only on condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to speak, said Huawei had already laid off several workers in Huawei Symantec’s Silicon Valley offices this month and planned to move its entire operation out of the United States, largely because of increased American government oversight.

In the next two weeks, Symantec, the Mountain View, Calif., computer security software firm, is expected to sell its 49 percent stake in the venture to Huawei for $530 million. The companies first announced the sale last November. In a news release, Enrique Salem, Symantec’s chief executive, said the project had “achieved the objectives we set four years ago” and would “exit the joint venture with a good return on our investment.”

As online espionage proliferates, the United States government has grappled with how best to share its classified cyberthreat intelligence with the private sector. In January, the Pentagon transferred an information-sharing pilot program, called the Joint Cybersecurity Services Pilot, to theDepartment of Homeland Security. The program was originally intended to share classified National Security Agency intelligence with military contractors. Homeland Security is expected to extend the program beyond those companies to antivirus companies, like Symantec, and network providers.

Symantec worried that its ties to Huawei would be a disadvantage when it came to being the recipient of classified threat information, according to the two people briefed on the matter. Cris Paden, a Symantec spokesman, declined to comment.

William Plummer, a Huawei spokesman, said that from Huawei’s perspective “both companies had a positive experience with the joint venture.” He added, “We are going to streamline the organization market by market including in the U.S.”

National security concerns have long dogged Huawei. Ren Zhengfei, Huawei’s founder and chief executive, is a former officer in China’s People’s Liberation Army, and American government officials and regulators have repeatedly raised concerns about Huawei’s close ties to the Chinese government.

In 2008, Huawei was forced to abandon a bid for 3Com, which makes antihacking computer software for the United States military, among other products, after an American government panel raised questions about the national security risks. In 2010, Huawei lost a bid to supply mobile telecom equipment to Sprint Nextel after lawmakers expressed similar concerns.

Supreme Court Decision on Right to Patent Genes Sends Shock Waves

Filed under: Uncategorized — Mr. Craig @ 11:30 pm

Justices Send Back Gene Case

By ANDREW POLLACK
Published: March 26, 2012

The Supreme Court on Monday ordered an appeals court to reconsider its decision to uphold patents held by Myriad Geneticson two genes associated with a high risk of breast and ovarian cancer.

Justice Stephen G. Breyer wrote the 9-0 decision.

The appeals court was told to take another look at the case in light of the Supreme Court’s ruling last week that a certain diagnostic test was not eligible for patents because it was a simple application of a law of nature.

The case, Association for Molecular Pathology v. Myriad Genetics, No. 11-725, is being closely watched because it involves the ethically charged but commercially important question of whether genes can be patented.

The company, along with the University of Utah, isolated the two genes in question, known as BRCA1 and BRCA2.

It also developed a test, costing more than $3,000, that examines extracted DNA from the genes for mutations that indicate a woman is at a high risk of getting breast or ovarian cancer. The patent on the genes prevents other laboratories from performing similar tests.

Monday’s rulings came in response to a lawsuit filed by the American Civil Liberties Union and the Public Patent Foundation on behalf of various medical groups, patients and researchers. The suit argued that human genes could not be patented because they were products of nature, and that Myriad’s monopoly on testing for mutations in those genes raised medical costs and prevented women from getting a second, confirmatory test.

In a ruling that shocked the biotechnology industry, a United States District judge in New York agreed, and invalidated the patents in 2010.

But the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, which specializes in patent cases, reversed the ruling last July. In a 2-to-1 decision, it said that DNA isolated from the body could be patented because it was “markedly different” in chemical structure from the DNA inside the body.

The plaintiffs then appealed to the Supreme Court to take the case.

Last week the Supreme Court ruled that a blood test developed by Prometheus Laboratories was not eligible for a patent because it merely reflected a law of nature.

The test looked for the chemicals formed when drugs used to treat certain gastrointestinal diseases are broken down in the body.

Based on the levels of those chemicals in the blood, doctors may increase the dose of the drugs to make treatment more effective or decrease it to avoid side effects.

In the unanimous decision, Justice Stephen G. Breyer wrote that inventors must do more than “recite a law of nature and then add the instruction ‘apply the law.’ ”

That decision dismayed some executives in the diagnostics and biotechnology industries, who said that lack of patentability could undermine incentives to develop personalized medicine, in which tests are used to determine which patients should get a drug, or what their dose should be.

But some doctor groups cheered the decision, saying that patents on tests could actually impede research.

Myriad’s stock fell the day of the Prometheus decision as investors feared it meant that the Supreme Court was inclined also to rule that genes could not be patented.

However, Myriad’s stock rose 56 cents to $23.34 on Monday, perhaps because the Supreme Court will now not be hearing the case itself, instead leaving it to the presumably more patent-friendly appellate court.

Some lawyers and other patent experts said the Prometheus decision might not apply that well to the Myriad case because Myriad’s patents are compositions of matter while the Prometheus patents are methods of testing.

“I think the logic is different because it’s about a thing rather than a method,” said Dr. Robert Cook-Deegan, director of the program on genome ethics, law and policy at Duke University.

Gregory A. Castanias, a lawyer representing Myriad, said the composition of matter patents would be on firmer ground. Referring to the Prometheus case, he said, “We don’t believe that that decision really changes the landscape with regard to our case at all.”

But Daniel Ravicher of the Public Patent Foundation said the Prometheus ruling contradicted the reasoning used by the appellate court to uphold Myriad’s patents. The isolation of DNA is a trivial, well-understood step, he said. “A unanimous Supreme Court has now undeniably declared that a trivial noninventive transformation” is insufficient for a patent, he said.

Myriad also had patents covering the process of analyzing the BRCA genes to see if they had mutations that raised the risk of cancer. The appeals court ruled those claims invalid, saying they involved only “patent ineligible abstract mental steps.”

NYT Foolishly Indicates Catholics are PRO Romney…. Not so fast….

Filed under: Uncategorized — Mr. Craig @ 11:21 pm

Interesting article.. although quite uninformed… yes, we know a majority of Catholics are Democratic… thank you for the graphic…. but what the author has failed to tell her audience is 2 very important facts… FIRST: that a majority of Republican Catholics failed to vote at all being totally disenfranchised by ALL the Candidates…. . and SECOND: that the Catholic Church does not recognize Mormonism as a Christian religion and has classified it as a CULT for  many decades now… those two facts belie the implication that Romney would win Catholics in the November election… Showing a woman saying that All Catholics ae modified now belies what the Church will say IF Romney is the nominee …. such journalism is just ridiculous in such a paper as the NYT.. I am aghast at the foolishness of this author, But still love the NYT (NY Times)  

Cathy Willauer, who is Roman Catholic and a mother of four, says that her religion is important to her and that she shares the same values as Rick Santorum.

 
Multimedia
The Catholic Vote

 A one-stop destination for the latest political news — from The Times and other top sources. Plus opinion, polls, campaign data and video.

But Mrs. Willauer, 50, who lives in Annapolis, Md., has decided to support Mitt Romney in Maryland’s Republican presidential primary on April 3. She said she had more confidence that Mr. Romney, a former governor of Massachusetts, could better manage the economy.

Besides, she said, Mr. Romney, who is Mormon, appears more tolerant of people of other faiths.

“While my personal values may align more closely with Senator Santorum’s,” she said, “I feel Governor Romney is more willing to tolerate different views and values, and the president of the United States has to accept and respect the right of every American to believe as they will.”

Mrs. Willauer, who attended a Romney event in Arbutus, Md., last week, is part of a striking pattern that has emerged during the Republican primary season: more Catholic Republicans are favoring Mr. Romney even though Mr. Santorum is Catholic.

Mr. Santorum, a former senator from Pennsylvania, has trailed Mr. Romney among Catholics in 10 of the 12 states in which Edison Research conducted exit polls that asked about religion.

With two exceptions, he has lost the Catholic vote by a minimum of 7 percentage points (in Michigan, where Mr. Romney grew up) and by as much as 53 percentage points in Massachusetts, where Mr. Romney was governor. He has even lost among Catholics in the South, although he was nearly tied with Mr. Romney among Catholics in Tennessee and won decisively among Catholics in Louisiana.

In most of the primary contests, whether he has won or lost, Mr. Santorum has been buoyed by the support of evangelical Protestants. He has done best in states with substantial evangelical populations and they have become his most reliable base, along with some Tea Partysupporters and those who call themselves very conservative.

In fact, many voters are unaware of his religion. A Pew survey this month found that only 42 percent of Catholic Republicans knew that Mr. Santorum was Catholic. At the same time, 11 percent of Catholic Republicans and 35 percent of white evangelical Republicans said they thought he was an evangelical.

“There’s an intensity to his statements, and to the subjects he discusses — the rise of secularism, the criticism of people of faith in the public square — that’s often associated with evangelicals,” said John C. Green, a political scientist at the University of Akron who studies religious voting patterns.

Analysts see many reasons for Mr. Santorum’s lagging among Catholic Republican voters, the main one being that Catholics, who make up about a quarter of the total electorate, are not monolithic and are more representative of the electorate as a whole.

“There is no Catholic vote, per se,” said Catherine E. Wilson, a political scientist at Villanova University. “They mirror the general population, with progressives, moderates and conservatives. And Santorum is winning the conservatives.”

In 1960, Catholics voted overwhelmingly for John F. Kennedy. But in 2004, when Senator John Kerry of Massachusetts became the first Catholic nominee since Kennedy, he lost the Catholic vote to President George W. Bush, a born-again Christian.

In 2008, President Obama won the Catholic vote over the Republican candidate, John McCain. This year, Dr. Green said, Catholics appear likely to be divided again, with conservatives voting for the Republican nominee, liberals voting for Mr. Obama and the moderates “up for grabs.”

So far, Mr. Romney, who has emphasized the economy, has been more successful in winning Catholics over than Mr. Santorum, who has emphasized social, cultural and religious issues.

An important indicator of voting preference is how often someone attends church. Those who attend at least once a week tend to be more conservative than those who attend occasionally. But only about one-third of Catholics who responded to the latest New York Times/CBS News poll said they attended church weekly.

Mr. Santorum was asked last week by Sandy Rios, a Fox News contributor hosting a program on American Family Radio, to explain why he was not winning more Catholic voters.

He said he did not understand it himself — “I really wish I could tell you,” he said — but he said he thought it might correlate with church attendance.

“With folks who do practice their religion more ardently,” he said, “I tend to do well.”

Joan Leon, 71, a retired nurse who voted for Mr. Santorum in Louisiana’s primary, would certainly qualify as an ardent Catholic. She attends church every day. Her chief concern is abortion — she strongly opposes it.

Mrs. Leon braved a raging storm, floods and a tornado watch last week to see Mr. Santorum when he visited Mandeville, near her home. She said he was “the most pro-life candidate,” though she also liked his experience on the Senate Armed Services Committee and his support for more oil drilling.

But most Catholics disagree with Mr. Santorum on various issues, according to recent New York Times/CBS News national polls. A majority have used artificial birth control and few attend weekly Mass. Most support either same-sex civil unions or marriage, and only a few would prohibit abortions altogether.

In his unsuccessful bid for re-election to the Senate in 2006, Mr. Santorum also lost the Catholic vote, by 18 percentage points. He was running against Robert P. Casey Jr., also a Catholic.

Mr. Santorum’s faith-related comments have sometimes caused an uproar, as they did last month when he said he wanted to “throw up” after reading John F. Kennedy’s 1960 speech asserting that the separation between church and state be absolute. Even Mr. Santorum, rarely one to back off a pronouncement, said he wished he had not used that language, but he stuck by his point, that people who try to express their faith in the public square are unwelcome and even persecuted. The comment may have played a role in his narrow loss in Michigan, the first state to vote after he made it.

Dr. Wilson at Villanova said that by talking about matters of faith so often, Mr. Santorum appeared to be “more preacher than presidential contender,” which can make Catholics, among others, uncomfortable.

“People want politicians to have faith,” she said, “but they don’t necessarily want to be hearing about it all the time.”

A Pew study last week confirmed that view, showing that more voters than ever want less religious talk from politicians. It was the first time since Pew started asking that question a decade ago that more people said there had been too much religious expression from politicians, not too little.

When he ran for president in 2008, Mr. Romney felt compelled to address fears that the Mormon Church would guide his policies. But this year, he has barely mentioned the subject. While some evangelicals remain suspicious of Mormons, Catholics like Mrs. Willauer of Annapolis say they have no problem with it.

“Because Governor Romney is Mormon, a family man, I don’t take issue with his religion,” Mrs. Willauer said. “I don’t know how the pope would feel about that, but we’re all modified Catholics these days anyhow.”

Santorum Hangs Tough While Romney @ ONLY 40% TOTAL Popular Vote

Filed under: Uncategorized — Mr. Craig @ 11:00 pm

Rick Santorum easily won the Louisiana Republican primary Saturday night, capturing a deeply conservative state with a hefty portion of the kind of evangelical Christian voters who have helped him claim victories in 10 other states.

La. Results »

CANDIDATE PCT.
 

Santorum 49.0%
 

Romney 26.7   
 

Gingrich 15.9   
 

Paul 6.1   
 

Others 2.3   
Updated March 25 with 100% reporting

The win gave Mr. Santorum a much-needed psychological boost but it will be unlikely to change the dynamics of the race. Only 20 delegates were up for grabs on Saturday, with 26 more to be allocated later. Even if Mr. Santorum were to claim most of them, he would still have only half the delegates that Mitt Romney, his chief rival, already has.

Mr. Romney’s win last week in Illinois, as well as his subsequent endorsement by Jeb Bush, the former governor of Florida, dimmed Mr. Santorum’s political prospects, although his victory in Louisiana showed how he could still complicate Mr. Romney’s efforts to capture the 1,144 delegates needed for the nomination.

In a fund-raising letter sent out Saturday night, Mr. Santorum said the results in Louisiana had sent “shock waves” through the political world.

“Tonight with our strong victory in Louisiana, our campaign has now won 11 states, tying a record and proving we can win in the West, South and Midwest,” the letter said. “Not since Ronald Reagan in 1976 has a conservative candidate won as many states as we have.”  

The reference was significant — to the year President Gerald R. Ford won more delegates to the Republican convention than Mr. Reagan but not enough to secure the nomination. Mr. Ford did win the nomination, and lost the election to Jimmy Carter, but Mr. Reagan came roaring back to win in 1980. Some analysts are already talking about a Santorum candidacy in 2016.

Mr. Santorum was campaigning on Saturday night in Wisconsin, and after he arrived at a tavern in Green Bay, he thanked voters in Louisiana.

“You didn’t believe what the pundits have said, that this race was over,” he said. “You didn’t get the memo.”

Newt Gingrich’s third-place performance in Louisiana was an embarrassing setback for a candidate who had hoped to perform well in Southern states to rescue his flailing candidacy. In fact, the returns suggested that both he and Representative Ron Paul would fail to meet the threshold to acquire any delegates at all. It was not immediately clear how many delegates Mr. Santorum and Mr. Romney would collect.

Despite Mr. Santorum’s victory, the states that vote next — most of them in the Northeast — are considered more favorable to Mr. Romney, the former governor of Massachusetts.

In Louisiana Mr. Santorum was able to demonstrate his hold over social conservatives, underscoring yet again Mr. Romney’s weaknesses among those voters. Mr. Romney also had to counter fallout this week from a gaffe by an aide, whose remarks comparing the campaign to an Etch A Sketch toy were seized upon by Mr. Santorum and others as evidence that Mr. Romney had no core values.

Robert Hogan, a political scientist at Louisiana State University in Baton Rouge, said that Mr. Santorum had generated more excitement in the state than Mr. Romney had and that his supporters were mobilized through networks of churches.

“These are issue voters who are committed to Santorum’s candidacy and will vote regardless of what barriers are put in the way,” Dr. Hogan said.

While campaigning in Louisiana this week, Mr. Santorum had to spend timebacktracking from a suggestion he made that voting for Mr. Romney would be no different from voting for President Obama. He subsequently issued a clarification, saying, “I would never vote for Barack Obama over any Republican, and to suggest otherwise is preposterous.”

Voters seemed to have little doubt about Mr. Santorum’s conservative stances, especially his opposition to abortion rights.

“I am against abortion; I am against gay marriage,” Patricia Sabido said as she voted for Mr. Santorum in Metairie. She said she agreed with his criticism of the Obama administration’s ruling that religious-affiliated institutions include contraception in their employee health plans. “I don’t think that should be forced down our throat,” she said.

His support among these voters was more or less expected, given his support from similar voters in other states. But it has not put to rest the major question mark hanging over Mr. Santorum’s candidacy — whether he can draw voters from beyond his base of social conservatives.

John Brabender, a strategist for Mr. Santorum, said that Mr. Romney’s showing in Louisiana showed he had “regional problems” and that conservatives had united behind Mr. Santorum.

And even if Mr. Santorum cannot win the number of delegates needed for the nomination, he said, Mr. Romney cannot either.

“If a candidate can’t show that amount of support, we go to another level,” he said, referring to a brokered convention in August.

Mr. Gingrich seems intent on staying in the race, and on Friday said he would not quit even if he made no progress in Louisiana toward his goal of depriving Mr. Romney of delegates.

“I have no incentive to get out of the race,” he said.

Some voters were not impressed. “I love Newt, but I just think it’s time for him to move on,” said Linda Facio, a Santorum voter in Metarie. “The young people out there need someone young who doesn’t feel like they’ve already done this.”

Women’s Rights Biggest Enemies: REPUBLICANS, MEN and CONSERVATIVE CHRISTIANS

Filed under: Uncategorized — Mr. Craig @ 10:30 pm

1 in 5 Pharmacies Hinders Teens’ Access to ‘Morning-After’ Pill: Study

MONDAY, March 26 (HealthDay News) — Nearly one in five U.S. pharmacies gave out misinformation to researchers posing as 17-year-old girls seeking emergency contraception, often saying that it was “impossible” for girls to get the pill, a new study finds.

About 3 percent of researchers posing as physicians also received wrong information about the availability of emergency contraception, also known as the “morning-after” pill.

The findings show that 17-year-olds in need of emergency contraception to prevent unintended pregnancy face significant barriers in accessing it, the study authors said. According to U.S. federal regulations, girls 17 and older can buy emergency contraception without a prescription if they show proof of age, while girls 16 and younger need a doctor’s prescription.

“What we found was that emergency contraception was pretty available, in that 80 percent had it on the shelf that day,” said lead study author Dr. Tracey Wilkinson, a general pediatrics fellow at Boston University School of Medicine and Boston Medical Center. “However, when teenagers asked if they could get the medicine, they were [sometimes] told they couldn’t get it at all, not with a prescription, not over-the-counter, just simply based on their age.”

The study, published online March 26, appears in the April print issue of Pediatrics.

In the study, researchers called all the commercial pharmacies in five major U.S. cities: Austin, Texas; Cleveland; Nashville, Tenn.; Philadelphia; and Portland, Ore. Each of the 943 pharmacies got called twice, once by a “17-year-old girl” and once by a “physician.” Researchers spoke to pharmacists, pharmacy technicians or unidentified pharmacy staff.

Four in five callers were told the pharmacy had emergency contraception in stock. However, 19 percent of 17-year-old callers were told that they could not obtain emergency contraception under any circumstances, while 3 percent of physicians were told their 17-year-old patient could not obtain it.

“Not just the callers posing as 17-year-olds, but the physicians were given wrong information by the pharmacy workers about over-the-counter access to emergency contraception,” said Dr. Deborah Nucatola, an ob-gyn and senior director of medical services for Planned Parenthood Federation of America. “This kind of misinformation can result in preventable, unintended pregnancy.”

About 85 percent of the roughly 750,000 teenage pregnancies in the United States each year are unintentional, the researchers noted.

Slightly more than half of workers in pharmacies that didn’t have emergency contraception on hand said they could order the medication, but about one-third offered no additional information about how girls or doctors could get it. Also, the teen callers were put on hold more often than doctors and talked less often to pharmacists, the study found.

Researchers do not know if any pharmacy workers intentionally misled the girls, or if they simply don’t know the law.

In 2011, the Center for Drug Evaluation and Research of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) recommended that younger teens be permitted to obtain emergency contraception without a prescription, but that was overruled by the U.S. Secretary of Health and Human Services.

Emergency contraception is a high dose of progestin that prevents pregnancy by delaying ovulation (when the egg leaves the ovary and travels into the fallopian tube where it’s available for fertilization by sperm). Some research suggests emergency contraception may make it more difficult for sperm to get past the cervix and into the uterus, and may make the uterus less hospitable to sperm.

Although the drug can be taken up to five days after unprotected sex, it becomes less effective the longer women wait. For every 12-hour delay in taking the first dose, the odds of pregnancy increase by 50 percent, according to background information in the study.

Emergency contraception is not an “abortive” drug, Wilkinson said. It does not affect an existing pregnancy or slow the transport of a fertilized egg from the fallopian tubes into the uterus, she said.

The average cost for emergency contraception was $45, ranging from $15 to $70.

Wilkinson added that emergency contraception should not be confused with RU-486 (mifepristone), which is used to terminate early pregnancies and is given by physicians under supervision.

To clear up the confusion, Wilkinson urged more education of pharmacy staff and said pediatricians and other health care workers must make sure that adolescents know their rights.

“Clinicians might help prepare their patients for this by writing a prescription as a backup to make sure they can access it when they need it,” she said.

 

No Matter How the Trayvon Martin Story Ends the Facts are Clear: THERE IS STILL RACISM IN AMERICA

Filed under: Uncategorized — Mr. Craig @ 10:00 pm

If you have already made up your mind about the Trayvon Martin  tragedy.. then do not bother to read anymore.. as It may make you angry…. but I will tell you this.. No matter what the final story is  of this particular story. Racism and bigotry are very much prevalent in America today… it is just that we don’t want to talk about it  because it is politically incorrect… or worse my show how fragmented America is today. 

George Zimmerman, the neighborhood watch crime captain who shot dead 17-year-old Trayvon Martin, originally told police in a written statement that Martin knocked him down with a punch to the nose, repeatedly slammed his head on the ground and tried to take his gun, a police source told ABC News.

Zimmerman had claimed he had called police about Martin, whom he found suspicious, then went back to his car when Martin attacked him, punching him.

The new information is the most complete version yet of what Zimmerman claims happened on the night of Feb. 26 when he shot and killed the teenager.

In addition, an eyewitness, 13-year-old Austin Brown, told police he saw a man fitting Zimmerman’s description lying on the grass moaning and crying for help just seconds before he heard the gunshot that killed Martin.

The initial police report noted that Zimmerman was bleeding from the back of the head and nose, and after medical attention it was decided that he was in good enough condition to travel in a police cruiser to the Sanford, Fla., police station for questioning. He was not arrested.

Martin’s girlfriend had said in a recording obtained exclusively by ABC News that she heard Martin ask Zimmerman ”why are your following me, and then the man asked, what are you doing around here.” She then heard a scuffle break out and the line went dead.

Phone records obtained by ABC News show that the girl, who is 16 and asked to remain anonymous, called Martin at 7:12 p.m., five minutes before police arrived, and remained on the phone with Martin until moments before he was shot.

ABC News has also learned that Martin was staying in Sanford at the time because he’d been suspended from Krop High School in Miami after school officials found him with a baggy that they suspected contained marijuana. He was staying at his father’s fiance’s house in Sanford.

Family spokesperson Ryan Julison confirmed to ABC News that Martin was suspended for an “empty baggy that had contained pot.”

“It’s irrelevant to what happened on Feb. 26, does not change material facts of the situation, specifically that had George Zimmerman not left his vehicle and heeded the police dispatcher’s guidance, we wouldn’t be here today,” Julison said.

During Zimmerman’s call to 911, the dispatcher asked him if he was following the teen. When Zimmerman replied that he was, the dispatcher said, “We don’t need you to do that.”

Martin’s mother, Sybrina Fulton, said at a news conference today, “All I’ve got to say is they killed my son, and now they’re trying to kill his reputation.”

The new information threatens to heighten tensions in the emotionally charged case. Sanford’s Mayor Jeff Triplett told ABC News that “the city today is a tinder box.”

“This city is a glass house, and making matters worse the civic center has a lot of glass,” he said referring to a town hall meeting slated for 5 p.m. where family and residents will be airing grievances about the Martin shooting.

In addition, the Rev. Al Sharpton said today that he and other protesters intend to “occupy” Sanford on Easter weekend and pray that the city arrests Zimmerman.

The details of Zimmerman’s early account of the confrontation could complicate pressing charges against him, which one veteran prosecutor has already said could be difficult.

“The stand-your-ground law is one portion of justifiable use of deadly force,” veteran State Attorney Angela Corey told ABC News. “And what that means is that the state must go forward and be able to prove it’s case beyond a reasonable doubt… So it makes the case in general more difficult than a normal criminal case.”

Zimmerman shot Martin dead the night of Feb. 26 after following him for several minutes. Zimmerman told police Martin looked suspicious because he was wearing a hoodie, and when he confronted him the two fought — ultimately resulting in a single bullet in Martin’s chest.

Trayvon Martin Case: Timeline of Events

Zimmerman claimed self defense and this weekend the lawyer counseling him, Craig Sonner, told ABC News that he was likely to invoke Florida’s controversial stand-your-ground law in his defense.

The law affords people enormous leeway to use deadly force if they feel their life is seriously endangered. Sonner said Zimmerman felt “one of them was going to die that night,” when he pulled the trigger.

Corey, a veteran prosecutor known for her zealous defense of victims rights was hand-picked by Florida Gov. Rick Scott for the job. But she faces other challenges in the case.

While in life Trayvon Martin was barely 17, when it comes to justifiable homicide his size — about 6-foot-3 and 150 pounds — makes him an adult in death.

Zimmerman, 28, is 5-foot-9 and weighs well over 200 pounds.

But with the Department of Justice and the FBI investigating this case as a possible hate crime, Corey might want to pursue that as well.

RELATED: Shooter’s Friend: George Zimmerman Has ‘Virtually Lost His Life, Too’

“So it would depend on which charge if any we’re able to file,” she said. “Before we would be able to determine, one, if this is a hate crime, and two, whether or not that would enhance the crime.”

Corey’s team is now reinvestigating a case that the Sanford Police Department is accused of bungling. Possible police missteps include failing to administer a toxicology exam on Zimmerman, not impounding his car, and failing to contact key witnesses — like Martin’s girlfriend, who was talking to the teen by cell phone and heard most of the scuffle with Zimmerman unfold.

ABC News has learned there is tremendous pressure from local and state authorities for an arrest.

Corey said parts of the investigation might only take a few more days to complete but charges, if they ever come, could be weeks away.

The FEAR OF A BLACK REPUBLICAN

Filed under: Uncategorized — Mr. Craig @ 9:20 pm

Fear of a Black Republican

Why are the Republican candidates struggling to win the support of African American voters?

 

In the southern US state of Mississippi nearly 40 per cent of the population is black. But during the state’s March 13 Republican primary, only two per cent of the voters were African Americans – and it was a similar picture throughout other Republican contests.

 

For years Republican leaders have said they would work hard to increase African American support for their party, but so far, those efforts appear to be a failure.

 

“I don’t think it’s accurate or fair to say the the Republican party is a party of racists.”

Ana Navarro, a Republican strategist

Craig Eisele responded: We are not a Party of Racist individuals but we are a party that facilitates racism and that is why many people (including moderate Republicans) are now fed up with the petty politics of the Republican Party and Politicians in general  and thereby view us as a party that seems to radiate hatred… including me 

 

When asked during an interview why the Republican party is poison for so many African Americans the only black candidate to run for the 2012 Republican ticket, Herman Cain, said it was because “…they have been brainwashed into not being open-minded, not even considering a conservative point of view.”

 

A documentary titled Fear of A Black Republican was just released here in Washington DC and it posed a similar question: Does the Republican party really want more black people?

So why has the Republican party not been successful in reaching out to black voters? And why are they also losing the hispanic voters?

 

To discuss these issues, we are joined by James Braxton Peterson, the director of Africana studies at Lehigh University; Ana Navarro, the National Hispanic co-chair for both John McCain and John Huntsman; and Kevin Williams, the director of the film, Fear of a Black Republican.

I think there is a core cultural competency challenge here that the Republican party… has lost it’s sense and its ability to connect with communities of colour. You’ve got to be competent about the cultural issues that are important to these communities and then we can talk about the different strategies for trying to secure their votes.”

James Braxton Peterson, analyst on black politics

“I think there is a core cultural competency challenge here that the Republican party… has lost it’s sense and its ability to connect with communities of colour. You’ve got to be competent about the cultural issues that are important to these communities and then we can talk about the different strategies for trying to secure their votes.”

James Braxton Peterson, analyst on black politics

 


 

LOSING THE BLACK VOTE:

 

  • The Republican party has currently little support among black voters
  • Since the early 1960′s black voters have overwhelmingly voted the Democratic party 
  • Richard Nixon was the last Republican candidate to get significant black support
  • Nixon got 32 per cent of black vote in his loss to John F Kennedy in 1980
  • President Lyndon Johnson got 94 per cent support from black voters after he signed the Civil Rights Act in 1964
  • Republicans promoted the abolition of slavery, gaining black votes
  • President Dwight Eisenhower got 39 per cent of black vote in 1956
  • In the 2008 election John McCain received just 4 per cent of black votes
  • In the 2008 US presidential election 95 per cent of African Americans voted for Obama


Trayvon Martin: The Myth of US “Post” Racialism

Filed under: Craig Eisele — Mr. Craig @ 8:45 pm
Tags:

The shooting of a young black man demonstrates how institutional and structural racism is still robust in the US.

Washington, DC - Trayvon Martin was just beginning his life. Trayvon Martin was a son. He was a high school junior, with college to look forward to, a career and perhaps a family of his own.

Trayvon Martin was many things, but for George Zimmerman, he was just Black. 

The teenager’s race was enough to raise “suspicion” and trigger the neighbourhood watchman – who possessed no training or authority, except for his racist prerogatives – to murder an unarmed and frightened teenager running for his life.

On November 28, 2011, no other colour but his Blackness mattered – and his rush for safe haven was intercepted by Zimmerman, and the structurally entrenched demonisation of Black men codified in our laws, perpetuated by our police forces and subscribed to by our friends and colleagues, classmates and family members.

Trayvon Martin is not, as many writers and pundits commented following his death, “a reminder of American racism”. For Africans Americans and most people of colour, racism, xenophobia and religious animus are common, if not expected, parts of their daily lives.

In the case of Trayvon Martin, a twin set of correlated racisms prematurely ended his life: Zimmerman’s view that a young Black male must be engaged in criminal or thuggish activity by virtue of his race alone; and the neighbourhood watchmen and police alike who execute the structural racism embedded in police departments and penal systems nationwide in the name of the law.

The myth of the Obama era

The election of President Barack Obama, for white America, signalled the shift away from America’s racially charged past. After 2008, white Americans have contended that the United States is experiencing the embryonic stages of a post-racial moment; Martin’s murder is a reminder of the fatal consequences of racism that makes the headlines. Yet, the intermediary steps – the institutional racism and empowering of people like Zimmerman – to police our communities either formally or informally are not deemed newsworthy.

Racism, generally understood as a conscious perspective, action or decision, is a salient core of the US’ history and present. American racism is interwoven into the country’s narrative, codified in its law and entrenched in its institutions. Its authors and gatekeepers were, and are, still largely white.

Whites seldom experience racism, either in its fatal, frequent, or latent form. This constructs the political ideology that the rest of the US has entered this racism-free utopia. Citizenship to this colour-blind state, however, is denied to African Americans, Muslim Americans and Latinos by virtue of a triumvirate of suspicions: crime, terrorism and illegal immigration. 

However, whites are not the only culprits of racism. On March 10, an Arab American gas station clerk on the Westside of Detroit gunned down and killed a 24-year-old African American customer after a dispute over the high-price of condoms. Racially charged crimes and murders between Latinos and Blacks are all too frequent, and the sometimes-explosive tension between Asian American and Arab American storeowners is well documented.   
 
Institutional and structural racism is still robust in the US. This is evidenced by the disparate incarceration rates of brown and Black Americans, the decimation of affirmative action and race-conscious legislation in the US, the crumbling public education systems in minority-populated communities and the all too common cold blooded murders of people of colour – both in the US and beyond its boundaries, whether by policemen, neighbourhood patrolmen or soldiers.

The ‘worst of a national psychosis’

Kumar Rao, a defence lawyer for the Bronx Defenders in New York City, stated that: “Martin’s killing reflects the absolute worst of a national psychosis: The view that Black males – young and old alike – are inherently threatening and unworthy of personal security; and that the state’s commitment to enduring that belief is perpetuated and institutionalised.”

Trayvon Martin’s murder was avoidable, but yet perversely justified through the cold silence of the state.
 
Zimmerman was a neighbourhood patrolman – not a police officer – but the distinction is thin in this instance. Some police officers, from Miami to Oakland, exhibit the same reckless and cavalier behaviour as Zimmerman. What is more troubling is that police officers and entire departments routinely cover up racially charged arrests, the roughing up of individuals under custody and operate with impunity under the cover of the law.

Yet, for Zimmerman, he had no such cover. This makes this case more absurd and baffling, particularly because he was given police orders to “discontinue his chase of Martin”, as revealed by 9/11 tapes released on March 19. If Zimmerman, a neighbourhood watchman – a volunteer with no training – had obeyed the policeman’s order, Martin would still be alive today.

Zimmerman ignored those order, and took the law into his own hands; he has still not been arrested.  
 
The importance of Trayvon Martin’s is also based on the urgency of the current socio-political moment. The New York Police Department makes every Muslim in the City, whether Black or Arab, South Asian or Latino, targets of illegal spying or worse – unjust convictions of terrorism based solely on their religion and ethnicity. The fact that the NYPD so far as to label Black American Muslims as an “ancestry of interest” shows how far law enforcement would go to justify religious and ethnic profiling.

Connecting the dots

Arab and Muslim Americans in New York are connecting the dots – whether it is the stopping and frisking of young Black and Latino men or the illegal spying on the everyday aspects of Muslims, people of colour are being targeted by the largest police force in the country. In order to defeat the institutionalised racism of the NYPD and set a precedent for the rest of the country, we must build coalitions, connect our struggles and in unison demand accountability for our communities. None of us will win alone.

In June 2009, a Miami policeman shot and killed Husein Shehada, a 29-year-old Arab American, after an evening club-hopping with his brother and girlfriend. Shehada, like Martin, was unarmed and posed no threat. Yet, the white policeman, Adam Tavss, believed that Shehada’s ethnicity substantiated the suspicion to shoot and kill. 

The value of Arab life – whether nameless Palestinian children bombed by American-funded fighter jets or American youth profiled, questioned and incarcerated for frequenting a particular mosque – is spiralling downwards rapidly in the US and at a more accelerated rate in the Arab World. 
 
Trayvon Martin is not a martyr or a symbol of racial injustice. Amadou Diallo, Sean Bell, Malice Green or Ramaley Graham, are all other young African American men shot down and killed because of the colour of their skin and countless others that remain unnamed. Most recently, Troy Davis shook the nation as another victim of a broken justice system that continues to fail people of colour not one person at a time but through mass incarceration and mass conviction rates.

Trayvon Martin was his own person and an archetype of our brothers, our sons, our nephews, grandsons. Trayvon is Mohammed walking down Atlantic Avenue, in Queens NY, vulnerable to patrolmen wary of his beard. Trayvon is Carlos, donning Dodger Blue in Pico Rivera, mistaken by the LAPD Gang Squad as a gangbanger because of the colour of his skin.  

Senegal Plays Game of Thrones

Filed under: Craig Eisele — Mr. Craig @ 8:40 pm
Tags:

Presidential challenger Macky Sall is being lionised by the media, but he too has links to controversial interests.

Kingston, Canada - For peasants and petty traders living under feudal monarchies, the only thing worse than living with a plundering, despotic king was not having one. When a king’s excesses led dissidents to seek a pretender, everyone suffered. During wars, harvests were stolen and the youth disappeared into armies and prostitution. Perhaps, the best portrayal of these circumstances is Bertold Brecht’s brilliant play, Mother Courage and Her Children, set amid Europe’s “Thirty Years’ War”.

For the majority of Senegalese citizens, the fantastic humiliation of an aspiring dictator is seen as a victory, insofar as it allows some calm to pervade the tense streets, as people return to their drudgery. To be sure, the maniacally stubborn president, Abdoulaye Wade, has not yet played his final hand, after having taken 35 per cent of the vote in the first round. Yet, fortunately, the chances of him pulling off a victory are extremely remote – in part because his main opponent, Macky Sall, is rather astutely taking advantage of this moment of stalemate.

Sall came in with 26.57 per cent, with Moustapha Niasse at 13 per cent, Ousmane Tanor Dieng at 11.5 per cent and Idrissa Seck at just under eight per cent. The final round will only include Sall and Wade, who will now be trying to convince the other candidates to give him their endorsement in return for a position in the government’s executive (equivalent to a cabinet).

Wade emerged after two days of silence following the humiliating results (before the elections he boasted a victory would come in the first round, with him easily garnering more than the necessary 51 per cent). Although Wade indicated then he would be “exploring coalition options”, the opposition appears to have held strong. At this point, a victory for his party would be widely interpreted as fraudulent and would put the country in a truly dire, ungovernable, crisis situation.

Despite the euphoria of a few, most people on the street are pretty cynical. They suspect all politicians to have been involved in stealing from the people. It appears to most a lot like a turf war among drug lords. What seems to matter to those elected is not so much the people on the street, as who gets to control the spoils.

Liberal freedoms matter

It is important, however, not to understate the significance of halting the rapid decay into authoritarianism that was taking place. As election results came through, showing Wade’s massive decline, the authority of the police on the streets was immediately deflated – rather than occupying the streets surrounding Independence Square in the centre of the capital, they were relegated to the sidelines. They even acted politely towards passersby. Wade massively misjudged his capacity to win the election. Even as he applied every trick of fraud he could manage, he was far from being able to “pull a Mugabe”.

Living amid the protests and police violence in downtown Dakar, I realised that one should never underestimate the value of liberal-democratic freedoms, even if they are primarily symbolic. Even Wade supporters I spoke to were shocked by the events of Sunday, February 19, which saw spontaneous anger unleashed toward police in every part of the city.

 

In Dakar’s poorest suburb of Rufisque, a young man was shot dead with live police ammunition, bringing the total number of deaths in recent weeks to at least seven. Cities across the country faced similar situations. Perhaps most significantly, groups of youths had targeted the main transport routes. Whether they knew it or not, this was one of the critical tactics that led to independence in so many countries across this continent. This was probably the day Wade lost the election.

Macky Sall should be supported, insofar as he is clearly indicating a willingness to implement a number of changes to limit powers of the future president and to increase space for public political expression. Beyond that, people should be suspicious and vigilant. Sall is playing the media spotlight exceptionally well, but he is, of course, Wade’s protégé. He claims that he will work to alleviate poverty and address healthcare and education (the nation’s literacy rate stands at 42 per cent, well below the average of 62 per cent for sub-Saharan countries). The problem, however, is that he has been remarkably vague on how he expects to accomplish these lofty goals. More importantly, his past actions show him to have been a key ally of the global one per cent.

Taking stock of the state

The basis of Senegal’s current gang-war politics stem partly from the fact that the state coffers are like Swiss cheese (Swiss Cheese was, quite appropriately, the name of the military paymaster in Brecht’s Mother Courage). Idrissa Seck was Wade’s former prime minister (as was Sall after him), but implicated in mismanagement of funds for road building and imprisoned in 2005, with Sall playing a key role as Wade’s henchman.

This is high-profile stuff, but the more insidious problem with the holes in state coffers is that much of the misuse of funds appears to occur somewhat legally. The liberalisation and privatisation agenda has seen public servants creating companies that pick up various outsource contracts at greatly inflated rates.Seck then accused Sall of misappropriation of public funds, amounting to seven billion CFA francs ($3.5million). Charges against Seck were dropped, but Sall fell out with Wade in 2008, when he started to ask questions about the management of state building contracts by Wade’s son, Karim.

Wade created an anti-corruption Authority for Regulating Public Contract in 2007, but the same year, it reportedthat more than 70 per cent of government deals were not properly vetted. When the authority found Karim Wade involved in a reportedly shady deal with US company Global Voice, the president claimed “presidential contracts” were not within the remit of the authority.

Money has flowed quite blatantly to Wade’s son and daughter – the latter organising a massive international music and arts festival in 2010 that brought musicians from all over the world. Some artists have reportedly still not been paid. But it’s the land deals and the telecommunications contracts that are much harder to dig up and challenge, in part because the forms of corruption take place through private contracts, over which members of government have managed to use their control as a form of rent to write in percentages of profits to themselves. Wade even did this with his statue.

Slippery Sall

The day after the election’s first round, Sall was still boasting of having been in Wade’s inner circle. Yet the following day, he was claiming that if he were to win, he would perform a full state audit and create more transparency in government. Even if he was involved in past thieving, this would no doubt be a positive step. But what kind of economy does he envision beyond that? More importantly, what portions of the economy is he not talking about?

Sall also suggested that key aspects of his economic policy would be to lower the cost of living (you would think he might contemplate increasing wages here, but that has yet to be proposed by any candidate).

He also said he would create jobs by spending 300 billion francs ($150 million) on investment and tourism development, establishing a job-creation project to create 500,000 jobs via youth entrepreneurship in leisure activities and tourist crafts, giving tax exemption to 80 per cent of retired ex-pat residents to draw them back to Senegal for six months a year, restructuring of the tourism sector (almost without doubt leading to the privatisation of state resources) and mandating an increase in VAT tax on tourism services.

This should be seen as utterly offensive to most people in Senegal, especially so because this comes from a man who was a minister of mines and marine resources. People want restrictions placed upon foreign fishing vessels in their waters, so they can get their fishing industry back. They want their agriculture industry to be revived. They want decent wages from their employers.

They would probably also like some of their mining resources to support secondary industries that could employ university graduates. The problem, however, is that many Senegalese are still unaware of the mining boom currently taking place in their country. The fact Sall is so quiet on this matter should lead people to ask some very significant questions about his role when he was the minister responsible.

Macky Sall was also once the head of the state petroleum company, which you might think would make him a little sceptical about gambling the country’s future on air travel, as global reserves are declining. Aside from the limited practicality of the plan, does he really think the youth in Ye’n a Marre are aspiring for careers as yes-men for European vacationers? Moreover, resort locations are already experiencing a downturn as a result of the financial crisis. People want dignity, not further servitude.

 The Canadian government and its gold corporations have been targets of indigenous resistance  [GALLO/GETTY]

Polluters and the one per cent

The likely reason Sall is silent about Senegal’s biggest prize is that he was allegedly involved in handing it over to the world’s biggest polluters and human rights offenders. I’m referring here to the West African Birimian geological belt in Tambacounda, found to have more than 10 million ounces of gold resources.

Sall was minister of mining when the constitution was changed to open it up to international exploration. The Canadian company, Teranga Gold Corp, made off with a 1,500km claim, and has since suggested: “Senegal is developing into a world-class gold district, for which Teranga Gold holds one of the largest land positions on the belt.”

Teranga boasts of its corporate responsibility on its website, but things on the ground are looking fishy. Teranga is a Wolof word, meaning “welcome”, yet the mining industry certainly has not applied that to some of the area’s former inhabitants. Oxfam has claimed that the population allegedly displaced by an Australian mining firm now lives in extreme poverty [Fr]. That really isn’t so bad for the company, however, as it must want a compliant workforce nearby to keep its operation going 24 hours a day.


In Kedogou, where at least one person was fatally injured during rioting, the governor, Mamadou Diom, acknowledged that the unrest was caused, in part at least, at the perception of the mines not employing local workers.
The problem manifested itself when protests against poverty and a lack of jobs in 2008 turned into a riot, where 26 were arrested and two were killed.

Diom is reported, in a leaked US cable marked “Confidential”, to have said: “People need to understand that large scale gold mining is very new and that jobs, especially those needing skilled labour, won’t be available overnight.”

He was later somewhat unsympathetic to his constituents. “They are lazy here,” Diom is reported to have said. ”All they want to do is strike it rich working in small time mines and then blow their money on women and booze.”

Among the executives at the region’s Teranga gold mine, Kathy Sipos and Yani Roditis are two of the vice-presidents, both of whom have had extensive careers at Barrick Gold and have worked on mining operations in Peru, Chile and Argentina – a point I will come back to.

A joint-owned Canadian and Saudi company, Iamgold, is also taking part in the gold rush in Senegal. Its CEO isStephen JJ Letwin. Letwin is a former vice-president of Enbridge, the company building pipelines across North America to transport tar sands extractions [PDF]. One such pipeline is embroiled in controversies with some of Canada’s first nation (native) communities who don’t want it destroying their ecosystems.

Letwin also used to sit on the board of directors of Canada’s highly influential right-wing think-tank, the CD Howe Institute, which basically writes government policy and is currently pushing the country’s healthcare and education system for privatisation.

Benjamin Little, another former Barrick Gold employee, also sits on Iamgold’s board. Little boasts of having been the senior policy adviser to Canada’s federal minister of industry and sits on Canada-Peru Chamber of Commerce. This brings us back to issues of Latin America.

The Canadian government and its gold corporations have been key targets of massive indigenous resistance movements. In Peru, where Canadian companies have invested more than $2.3billion, a crackdown on indigenous protesters by the Peruvian government killed at least 50 people. One important comment on this has been written by Todd Gorden.

Many Senegalese have been outraged by the seven deaths of protesters on their streets and have sought support from the international community to “stop Wade’s terror”. The reality, however, is that if Peru can get away with killing 50 protesters without an outcry from international officials, why would they care about seven in Senegal?

These gold companies are run by the people who are pocketing millions that could otherwise be used to support welfare programmes and economic diversification in Senegal.

It’s hard to fathom what the sizes of their paycheques are, but one executive, Paul Olmstead, pulled in a 2006 salary worth nearly $600,000 from Iamgold. That was before the deposits even turned up any gold. What are these executives making now and what is heading to their investors?

While these executives are receiving salaries in the hundreds of thousands of dollars (before stock options are even considered), my own contacts in Dakar tell me their relatives who work in the mud, sweat and tears of the mines themselves make around $7,000 a year. Admittedly, this is a good wage when compared with the average income of the impoverished, aid-reliant nation of just, according to World Bank figures, $1,090 a year (gross national income per capita). but even this sure doesn’t go far when just about everything is imported (even the national staples of rice, potatoes and onions). You would be very hard pressed to find a Senegalese person earning $7,000 a year who thinks the arrangement is a fair distribution of wealth from the mines.

Beyond the country’s lost potential revenues from these companies, one should question what the long-term environmental impacts might be. One key reason for doing this is that the annual reports of these companies make it quite clear they are planning a hit-and-run operation. Teranga’s 2011 annual report shows they are optimistic of operating for 10-15 years at best. They plan to take out the gold and leave, but what then will happen to all those people who were displaced? What then happens to those who worked in the industry? What then happens to those who lost their grazing land?

The track-record of many of the players in this industry is not good. Chet Idziszek is the president and director of Oromin, another company involved. In 1990, he won “mining man of the year” award (I guess it is presumed they are always men) for his role in “developing” the Eskay Creek in British Columbia, Canada. The Eskay Creek Mine is in the headwaters of the Unuk River in British Columbia, the traditional territory of the Tahltan First Nation. Barrick purchased the mine in 2001 from Homestake, and opened it in 1995. It was reportedly depleted by 2008 and closed.

For a short time, the Tahltan enjoyed near full employment. But the native jobs tended towards truck driving, catering and chamber-maiding. By the time Barrick Gold called it quits in early 2008, the Tahltan Iskut community had little to show for it, except for two tailings lakes that, according to Mining Watch [PDF], are likely to be heavily polluted. One cannot know, however, because laws in Canada protect mining companies from having to tell the public details about their operations.

These cases are particularly disturbing when one considers the fact that most of this gold will not be used to develop electronics or false teeth or anything useful to society - but will ultimately end up simply manufactured into bars, stored by the super-rich in bank vaults.

Macky and the mines

Macky Sall is himself a mining engineer. He was minister of mines when these companies were established in Senegal. One can only imagine he spent many hours dining with these executives who make off with so much of the country’s wealth.

It might also be worth noting that elsewhere in Africa, governments are re-examining their taxation and ownership arrangements with mining companies. Zambia and South Africa are two examples, although Julius Malema wasexpelled from the ANC after he suggested nationalising the mines. Even Australia’s minority government has managed to create a new mining tax.Senegalese people should be asking what Sall thinks about the gross inequalities between the incomes of these mining executives and those of the Senegalese majority. They should also be asking whether these corporations in fact supported his campaign, which has allowed him to travel continually around the country over the past two years.

Unless Macky Sall openly states otherwise, Senegalese people should be aware that he has been cavorting with people who are deeply involved in human rights abuses and ecological destruction of monumental proportions. Moreover, they are bedfellows with the current conservative Canadian government, which functions as one of the worst obstructionists in global climate change talks.

It is a government that, moreso than any previous administrations in the nation’s recent history, has cracked down on its own citizens who try to challenge the country’s increasingly imperial role in the world. Moreover, it is a government that is increasingly unwelcoming to immigrants and refugees - especially from Africa.

Canada’s immigration minister actually seems to think a bit like a mining executive in his approach to people in the “third world”. Faced with an overwhelming number of skilled applicants, he is currently seeking to “mine the backlog” for those who fit the country’s labour needs.

The majority of foreigners brought into Canada are now done so using temporary work visas that offer no benefits from the state, though workers must pay taxes and are subject to discrimination. Even those who come in with high qualifications make $6.30 an hour less than the average Canadian, and face much higher unemployment.

So while the elite of Canada experience Senegal’s teranga and take away its wealth, Senegalese people are not welcome in Canada - unless they are in the tiny portion of the population that can afford to come to our universities or bring in $800,000 to start businesses. Meanwhile, poverty-stricken “illegal immigrants” may face a year-long jail term, arguably in contravention of the UN’s refugee convention. 

Back in Senegal, Sall has a daunting task to manage unemployment of massive proportions (reportedly as high as 50 per cent in some demographic sectors) without being able to do anything to alter the underlying economy. It remains much as Frantz Fanon wrote in 1961:

“The national economy of the period of independence is not set on a new footing. It is still concerned with the groundnut harvest, with the cocoa crop and the olive yield. In the same way there is no change in the marketing of basic products, and not a single industry is set up in the country. We go on sending out raw materials; we go on being Europe’s small farmers, who specialise in unfinished products.”

Sall has not proposed any dramatic changes to this arrangement. So far he has only indicated that he thinks the unemployed youth will serve the cocktails and provide the sight-seeing for the mining executives as they come in and out of the country. Amid Dakar’s bars popular among engineers, these young service staff are already outnumbered by sex-workers, while the boys left behind rap in the slums. 
 
A glance at the latest video by Beuz Mc, titled Fou rewmi dieum ["Where are we going?"], suggests the youth ofY’en a Marre are much more attuned to the needs of the economy than the likely soon-to-be president. They show the need for infrastructure and public-sector jobs in waste treatment and sanitation, road construction and electricity sectors - and policies that do not prioritise the mining sector above the health of nursing mothers, safe water, cheaper energy, health care or education.

Theme: Rubric. Blog at WordPress.com.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 1,500 other followers

%d bloggers like this: